Monday, March 25, 2013

Thoughts on Doctor Who: Steven Moffat

NOTE: These are my personal opinions. I am in no way discrediting other people's opinions, in fact, if you do have a different viewpoint, I'd be interested to hear it!


I began watching Doctor Who right before series 6 premiered, marathoning the first 5 seasons on Netflix. Series 6 was the first one that I watched as it aired, so the experience already felt different. I quickly realized it wasn't the way I was watching the show, but the story itself that bothered me. 

The current showrunner of Doctor Who is Steven Moffat. He was a writer on the show under Russell T. Davies, the showrunner who began the reboot. Moffat took over in season 5 and has been running the show ever since. Moffat is an excellent episodic writer. His episodes from the RTD era are some of my favorite Doctor Who episodes ever (I'm pretty sure "Blink" is in most fan's top 5). He can write monsters really well: the Weeping Angels, the Vashta Nerada, and the Silence (as weird as the storyline was, they are freaking creepy) are all some of the scariest monsters the show has ever seen. The problem I have with his writing is that he cannot seem to write a believable season-long storyline that viewers can connect with. RTD had Bad Wolf, Torchwood, Vote Saxon, and the stolen Earth storylines: they were hinted at throughout the season, and then came to fruition in the season finale. Moffat seems to want twists and turns in every episode of a season, which confuses the audience too much (I don't mean to suggest the DW audience is dumb, because even a genius would have a bit of trouble understanding exactly what is happening). For example, take River Song's storyline. When she was introduced in season 4 (in a Moffat-written episode), she had so much potential. A time traveler like the Doctor was bound to meet someone who he didn't know, but knew him. But what Moffat did to her - she can regenerate, she is in jail for killing someone, she's Amy and Rory's daughter, she and the Doctor are married (?!) - was half unbelievable, half incredibly predictable. The moment the Doctor was killed in the season 6 premiere and we were reminded River was in jail for murder, it was extremely obvious who killed the Doctor, the only question left was why. 

And then you have the companions. Don't get me wrong, I love the Ponds more than anything and I am looking forward to seeing Clara interact more with the Doctor. But I don't feel I can relate to them. Now, I haven't seen any Classic Who (although I am planning on starting it over the summer), but purely based off of the RTD era, companions are supposed to be normal people who are made extraordinary by their travels with the Doctor. Amy and Clara do not follow that formula (you could make an argument for Rory, so I'll leave him out for now). At first, it seemed that Amy was just an ordinary girl, but we eventually found out Prisoner Zero being in her house was not a coincidence. She was clearly special before the Doctor ever met her. Clara is a plot point, pure and simple. She exists only as a problem the Doctor wants to figure out. I'm not sure if he would even want her as a companion if she wasn't special. The reason that I have a problem with this is the fact that the companion is supposed to be our entry into the Doctor's world; that is why his companion is almost always a human. Starting as human and becoming something more by traveling with the Doctor is something about which we can fantasize. Amy and Clara began as extraordinary, making them that much less relatable. 

I still love Doctor Who, don't get me wrong. It is one of my favorite shows currently on the air, and I am anticipating the 50th anniversary special with baited breath. From a writing perspective, there are a few things that I would change, but nothing can be perfect, right?

No comments:

Post a Comment